Prabhjo t SinghDigitally signed by Prabhjot Singh DN: cn=Prabhjot Singh, o= SikhSangat, ou=SikhSangat, [email protected] om, c=GB Date: This argument does not hold any ground when we evaluate it with some rationality. Many Sikhs take an easy approach and reject the authority. Sampooran Bachittar Natak Katha from Sri Guru Dasam Granth Sahib Ji. Katha completed by Singh Sahib, Giani Amarjeet Singh Ji, Sachkhand.
|Published (Last):||14 January 2015|
|PDF File Size:||17.59 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.20 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This argument does not hold any ground when we evaluate it with some rationality.
Religion is not inherent. Guru Ji rejected wearing sacred thread, caste and varna system, idol worship, authority of Vedas, puranas, and simaritis, bachittra gods including Vishnu, Shiva and Brahma which are the core belief system of Hinduism. Ntak are stone idol worshippers, I break idols and I worship one Lord. The Lord is not in any stones. Worship that Lord by whose adoration is destroyed all conflicts.
Is the RSS really willing to call someone Guru Ji in this case a Hindu who openly rejected Hinduism on all grounds and formed a new community with belief system that was entirely opposed to Hinduism?
Furthermore, why those Christians and Muslims who are converts from Hindus, not called Hindus? If someone is born in a family in which the father is a Hindu and mother is bacuittar Christian how would the religion be determined of the new born baby?
If a Christian, who believes in Jesus and follows the teachings of Bible, claims his great-great-great grandfather to be from a Hindu family does that mean he is bacjittar a Hindu? If no then why does the same not apply to Sikhs? Nonetheless Hindus should very well familiarize themselves with Sikh way of life before making such derogatory and barbaric comments.
A person is never born as a Sikh. Therefore, Guru Gobind Singh Ji also lost his ties with his family background and thus his ancestry had nothing significance in the life of Guru Gobind Singh not that it had any significance to begin with.
Can Sikhs really be from a religion whose father is Gandhi and mother is a cow? Since when did Hindus become a nation and since when did Hinduism become a religion? RSS has no answers to these questions.
In the followers Hindus attacked their own holy place and destroyed their own sovereignty Akal Takhat Sahib. They desecrated their own holy scripture Guru Granth Sahib Ji and smoked cigars inside the complex.
Why such hostility and hatred towards Sikhs exists if they are Hindus? Can a community really attack their own place of worship and dishonour their own women?
Bachittar Natak – Wikipedia
Even cave men did not attack their group members. If Sikhs are actually Hindus then why are they called a minority? This could go on but RSS has no answers to the above listed questions and arguments. Sikhs are a separate nation and Sikhi is a separate religion.
It is only foolish and stupidities on their part to first claim Sikhi as part of Hinduism and then not follow and adopt it. Leave a Reply Click here to cancel reply.
Mail will not be published required. Does this mean Sikhs are Hindus? April 12th, No Comments.